National Army Subscription – A Sign Of The Times
The debate about national army subscription concerns implementing compulsory military service or conscription in a country.
Podcast
National Army Subscription
The debate about national army subscription concerns implementing compulsory military service or conscription in a country. This debate typically involves weighing the benefits and drawbacks of requiring citizens to serve in the armed forces for a certain period of time.
Supporters of national army subscription argue that it promotes national defence, fosters a sense of duty and patriotism among citizens, and provides valuable training and discipline. They believe mandatory military service helps build a solid and capable defence force, ensures a fair distribution of national security burden, and enhances social cohesion.
Spotify
Concerns
On the other hand, opponents of national army subscription raise concerns about individual freedoms and personal choice. They argue that forcing individuals to serve in the military goes against the principles of liberty and autonomy. They also highlight potential social and economic disruptions caused by conscription, such as disrupting education or career plans and negatively impacting the labour market.
The specific arguments and perspectives on national army subscription can vary depending on the country and its unique circumstances. Ultimately, the debate revolves around finding a balance between national security needs and individual rights and freedoms.
Soundcloud
Conversation Questions – Part 1
1. Is it necessary in today’s modern warfare landscape?
2. Should it be implemented as a mandatory requirement for all citizens?
3. Does it promote a stronger sense of patriotism and national identity?
4. What are the potential economic implications of implementing a national army subscription?
5. Should individuals have the right to choose whether or not to serve in the military?
6. Does it unfairly burden certain sections of society, such as lower-income individuals or marginalised communities?
7. How does it impact gender equality in the military?
8. Should there be alternative forms, such as community service, instead of mandatory military service?
9. How does it affect the education and career prospects of young individuals?
10. Does it enhance or hinder social cohesion within a country?
Conversation Questions – Part 2
10. Does it enhance or hinder social cohesion within a country?
11. Should the duration of national army subscription be the same for all citizens, or should it vary based on specific circumstances?
12. How does it impact mental health and well-being?
13. Does it ensure a more prepared and capable defence force in times of crisis?
14. Should exemptions or deferments exist for specific individuals, such as conscientious objectors or those with medical conditions?
15. How does it impact the relationship between the military and civilian society?
16. Should incentives or benefits be provided to individuals who serve in the military through national army subscription?
17. What measures can be taken to minimise the potential adverse effects on individuals’ lives?
18. Does it promote discipline and character development in young individuals?
19. Should it be tailored to address specific national security challenges and needs?
20. How does it compare to volunteer-based military recruitment regarding effectiveness and efficiency?
If you are preparing for an IELTS exam, please complete the following essay writing task for homework.
Supporters of national army subscription argue that it promotes national defence, fosters a sense of duty and patriotism among citizens, and provides valuable training and discipline. Those who oppose this concept believe that it has adverse effects on society.
Write an essay to provide your opinion. The time allowed to complete this task is at most forty minutes. You must write a minimum of 250 words. Corrections and a score will be provided at the beginning of your next class.
